Parliament is a bunch of useless politicians like HRD minister. I also heard that Arjun Singh did this to give a clear advantage for Rahul Gandhi when he enters politics. Long live bloody vote bank politics.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 12:49 )
Harman
Its all our fault . The "unreserved " majority didnt vote when it really mattered .Now we are fighting to have our voices heard. The rest came out in droves to vote , the system is overflowing with filth, lets just not waste our vote the next time, nothing less...lets make sure that the Congress doesnt get voted back to power. Better vote for a party with a communal tinge than one which follows caste and religious appeasement poitics. Sadly thats the state of affairs in our beautiful country. "Congress ka haath reserved category ke saath and general category ke gaal pe" .
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 12:24 )
glsahni
Great man. Karan has cornered Arjun once again. And if this Arjun have little self-respect left should go to exile and do not show his face in public for 50 (fifty) Years at least. Actually I am wishing a long life full of shame.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 12:08 )
Joydeep
I think that Mr. Arjun Singh should not be a HRD Minister. Whom he believes to be his ideal, Pt. Nehru, he does not agrees to his idealogy. These reservations are not helping in any terms , they are widening the gap between the two sections of the society. Does the reservations theory does not goes against the Secularism of the country that are being boasted off and used as a ingredient to draw votes.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 12:05 )
Katty
Well, if Mr.Arjun Singh cannot talk about anything, if he cannot decide about anything and cannot share his views on "what the other correct ways are" then what is the point in continuing office.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 12:01 )
glsahni
The interview indicates one thing that Arjun Singh has no clear thinking. Every question asked he passes on to parliament. Such people who cannot think clearly if are in majority in parliament one can imagine the standard of decisions the parliament takes. So the conclusion is what ever such mediocre thinkers decide by majority is right. Even a layman could have put his views in clear terms to each and every question of the interviewer. I am ashamed to have our parliament full of such people.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 11:41 )
Subhajit
I think Mr Arjun Singh is desperately seeking attention and more focus on him. He is just a sick man who in his last phase of life doing dubious things.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 11:30 )
Gaurav
Simply the decision of reserving more seats to OBCs is Pathetic and disgusting, Mr.Thapar were excelent but Mr.Minister's comments are rediculous.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 11:28 )
vishal & soni
Arjun Singh's soul must rest in peace, coz after hearing so much abuses, he should have comitted suicide by now. V r amazed by the attitude of Govt of India as to how they can make such an arrogant, dumb politician our HRD & support him in this unnecessary torment for students of India. It seems v again need 4-5 more Goswamis this time to end this matter once for all so that no other Arjun Singh comes out with such a bland issue, ever again. V r always there with u guys & c ya today at Ramlila ground.
( Posted: Saturday , May 27, 2006 at 11:27 )
Arjun
I am glad that someone forwarded me a link to the transcripts for this interview. Good work, Mr. Thapar...your questions were well researched and they flowed smoothly from one to the next. This interview, really , once again, bares the fact - how incompetent our cabinet level ministers are. A HRD minister doesn't know a thing about a bill he is championing, a bill which is going to impact so many lives for so may years to come.Besides, Mr. Sing was rude at times. (I wonder what would happen if Mr. Thapar is to interview Laloo Yadav or Mulayam Sing...I don't think they will survive the full course of the interview.
Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate. Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language. Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome. Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions. Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published. Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible. Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure. Do try to use English to write your comments.
Please enable javascript in your browser to use this form.
Disclaimer
All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of CNN-IBN, unless specified otherwise. CNN-IBN is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of CNN-IBN.
Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate.