Read
Listen
Watch
Play
Find
Mail
Biggboss2      

NETWORK18

News Videos Blogs

Live TV» CNN-IBN | IBN 7 | IBN LOKMAT

Masand's Verdict» Hello | The Accidental Husband

Font Size A+A-

Devil's Advocate: Prachanda on Indo-Nepal relations

TimePublished on Sun, May 18, 2008 at 22:57, Updated on Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:03 in World section

LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR? The 1950 Indo-Nepal treaty is not beneficial for Nepal, says Prachanda.

LOVE THY NEIGHBOUR? The 1950 Indo-Nepal treaty is not beneficial for Nepal, says Prachanda.


        

Featured Blog

Featured Slideshows

Page 3 of 6

Prachanda: I will have to discuss with him. I do not know in what context he said it.

Karan Thapar: One of the problems in renegotiating the treaty is that India may use the opportunity to look for better terms. Does that work for you? You want better terms for Nepal. India may want better terms for itself.

Prachanda: It is beneficial for both sides to review the treaty and upgrade it according to the new necessity. When Rana resigned, a lot of changes have come in Nepal and there has been a lot of change in India. Thus the 1950 treaty should be upgraded according to the new necessity.

Karan Thapar: You also said that you want to review all the other treaties to see what revisions or further enhancements can be made. Is that a decision to revoke the other treaties and renegotiate them or simply the desire to review them?

Prachanda: Yes, I want to have a general review on all the treaties. But specifically I want to review the 1950 treaty.

Karan Thapar: The 1950 treaty, you want to change, but others you want to just review generally?

Prachanda: Yes, we want changes in the 1950 treaty, others may be okay, or may be revised, but we want to generally review them.

Karan Thapar: People in India after they hear you, will say that Mr Prachanda on one hand wants a new and a better, closer and a stronger relationship, on the other hand, he wants to revoke the 1950 treaty, review all other treaties and he wants equidistance from China and India. Aren’t these two things contradictory?

Prachanda: It is not contradictory. According to me it will help in better relations, will strengthen relations, and have close cooperation with each other. By review, we mean, both sides will be there, and we will review the historical treaty to upgrade it and revise it according to the new necessity.

Karan Thapar: You also say that India can also look for new advantages and gain?

Prachanda: Yes exactly.

Karan Thapar: However, the problem is that when both countries start reviewing things, and when you start revoking treaties and you start changing relations that have been there for 50 years, you can end up creating problems and damaging Indo-Nepal relations. Does that not worry you?

Prachanda: No, that will not happen. When your intention is to strengthen relations for betterment, how can it then sabotage relations or even destroy them.

Previously, India vouched for a two-pillar theory and that monarchy should be there in Nepal. However, now that there will be no monarchy and many political changes will take place, then there has to be a change.

Karan Thapar: So you want to re-negotiate the relationship.

Prachanda: Yes.

« Previous Page1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page »

Related links:

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us

© 2008 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture