Before commenting to harbhajan,we should consider the statement made by dhoni.He compared this incudent similar to famous footballer ziddane.zinadin zidane was famous player n cool person.But he hitted his opponent in heat of moment.same case happened with harbhajan,sreesant was proviking him.If Bcci banning harbhajan then why not sreesanth.BHAJI is repentant for his did,he is good spinner and match winner for india.Due to bhaji we stopped winning row of australia in 2001.UNFORTUNATELY in india cricket lover only see present time and present form,never give one look to past splendid performance.IF WE WANT TO DOMINANT AUSTRALIA CRICKETING FORMANCE AND SLEDGING WHICH AUSTRALIAN USING FOR WINNING MATCH BY CREATING MENTAL TENSION AMONGST RIVAL TEAM,HARBHANJAN IS NICHE FOR GIVING ANSWER TO AUSTION EITHER BY HIS BALLING PERPERFORMANCE OR REVERT SLEDGING OF AUSTRALIAN CRICKETER.
( Posted: Tuesday , May 13, 2008 at 16:26 )
rshastri
Bharat Mata ki jay, Bhartvasiyon ki jay. Incredible India(n) people.
BCCI President Sharad Pawar has time to look into the report, but he doesnt have time to look after the farmers problem around the states. As the saying goes "its all money...honey" 3 cheers to IPL
And lastely i dont know how every news channel predicts the result saying " it is learnt from so and so" , thats means someone is sharing something with someone(within the channel reports) again for "money"...
( Posted: Tuesday , May 13, 2008 at 14:57 )
MRB
Nanavati can't certainly give remarks like saying "he is already banned for 11 matches". Everybody knows this. He shouldn't comment anything supporting Bhajji to create a sympathy for Bhajji. Bhajji must get a ban for life. This is what is expected for the eminent BCCI decission makers. India have a pool of excellent players for the Gentlemens game.
( Posted: Tuesday , May 13, 2008 at 14:56 )
aditya
Shard Pawar will have time to examine this useless piece of report to punish a stupid obnoxious weed but will not have time to investigate or explain to Indians why we had to import so much of wheat and why such a huge amount of wheat is being disposed as bad for even animal consumption!
( Posted: Tuesday , May 13, 2008 at 14:29 )
Daniel
Indian Cricket has had enough of bajji, its time we set an example to the gentelmans game by banning bhajji for life, this should serve as a grim reminder to other players who often likes to have a go at team mates or opponents, these people are supposed to be role models what kind of examples are they setting to youngsters, Indian cricket doesnt need such kind of ruffians, BCCI should not be lenient at all in such a case especially in physical bouts.
( Posted: Tuesday , May 13, 2008 at 14:01 )
Shyamal Bhattacharjee
Dear Friends, Merely taking away a pot of water from the river, does not make any difference to the river water.This would be the asme expample if it is applied to Harbhajan. It is not going to make any difference to him, wether ban him for 10 years, 10 test or 10 ODI. He will remain the same.The meida,especially one of the TV chaneel from North, which has one former test star, doing all sort of adultery commenting,would be happy that their effort to save him bore the fruit.One fine day, somebody from that channel will be slapped by Harbhajan.That is the day that we are waiting to see Thanks Regards Shyamal Bhattacharjee Bangalore
Do not be rude to other users/authors or disrupt an ongoing conversation/debate. Do not use ethnic slurs, engage in personal insults or use objectionable language. Criticism, when constructive and non-disruptive is always welcome. Comments with links in them won't be published other than in cases of rare exceptions. Comments that include personal details such as postal addresses and telephone numbers will not be published. Keep the comments relevant to the topic as much as possible. Do not impersonate another reader or a public figure. Do try to use English to write your comments.
Please enable javascript in your browser to use this form.
Disclaimer
All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of CNN-IBN, unless specified otherwise. CNN-IBN is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of CNN-IBN.