NETWORK18

News Videos Blogs

What’s Hot » Bigg Boss 2 | Hottest Housemates

Now Showing» Phoonk | Mumbai Meri Jaan

Font Size A+A-

India, a gas bag on global warming

TimePublished on Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 03:02, Updated at Tue, Dec 18, 2007 in Nation section

BREAKTHROUGH OR BREAKDOWN? The Bali summit could not take substantive steps to fight global warming.

BREAKTHROUGH OR BREAKDOWN? The Bali summit could not take substantive steps to fight global warming.


        

Other stories in the section:

Featured Blog

Featured Slideshows

Page 2 of 2

The panel, drawing on the work of more than 3,500 leading climate scientists, found that the evidence for climate change was "unequivocal", that human actions in burning fossil fuels were to blame and that if the world were allowed to warm by 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, some of the effects – droughts, floods, storms, sea level rises – would be "irreversible" and "catastrophic".

So, is this the time to discuss rich country versus poor country or is it time to pull up our socks before it is too late?

“This is absolutely the time for us to find a way ahead. But that is not going to come from countries like India and China saying ‘just because you are not able to cut emissions let us roll over and play dead.’ It’s not going to happen,” Narain said.

“The elements of the deal, given the urgency, have to be twofold. The rich nations, not only the ones who have created the problem but also the nations who today contribute to the bulk of emissions, have to take on bindings and tough commitments. The rich nations have increased the emissions by 11 per cent,” she added.

The US has 4 per cent of the world’s population and contributes one fourth of global emissions of heat trapping and greenhouse gases. The US, of course, is not a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol. So, without the US committing is there any future in combating climate change?

To these statistics Narain added “another frightening statistic.” “Between 1990 and 2005 the US has actually increased its emissions by 20 per cent. So, this is one country, which refuses to negotiate on climate change because it says it will affect its lifestyle,” an exasperated Narain said.

Experts agree that the need of the hour at least in India is to spread awareness within the country and take climate change to a more substantive level rather than keeping it just as a political battle between the developed and developing countries.

Concluding the discussion Narain said, “This is not a political battle. This is a battle for economic space in the world. The poor nations have to argue for ecological space. We can avoid emissions in the future but for that let us be clear that it will cost a lot. For high-end technology money is required which the rich countries are not willing to invest in. Here is an opportunity for a global deal but we are not going for these negotiations with a proactive stand. We are just keen to win some brownie points in a fake deal.”

Final results of the poll:

92 per cent – No

8 per cent – Yes

Related Headlines

powered by

Related links:

Total Comments: 1

Copyright © IBNLive.com. All rights reserved. Reproduction of news articles, photos, videos or any other content in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of IBNLive.com is prohibited.

Read more comment »

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us

© 2008 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture