India ready for quota? Question merits debate
Published on Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:44, Updated on Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 20:10 in Nation section
Tags: Obc Quota, Reservation

OPINION WITHOUT RESERVATIONS: SC upholds OBC quota but keeps creamy layer off it. Is it a right decision?
To this, Gupta said, "The politicians who want the creamy layer to be retained in the quota purview are expressing partisanship in a very bare-knuckled, in your face, no holds barred kind of attitude - which would really be shocking anywhere else in the world."
However, he added that if the creamy layer was allowed in, then one would have taken away the raison d'ĂȘtre (reason for being) of the reservation system.
"Remember also, that the Mandal formula gave 12 points to social backwardness and only four points to economic backwardness, which only showed that Mandal wanted to camouflage the interests of the well-to-do backward class people. This is exactly why certain politicians are so interested in keeping up Mandal," he stated.
Education: A mission impossible for backwards
Gupta made a very valid point saying that as far as going to the people was concerned, the poor backward class people in villages are not really thinking of IITs and IIMs.
"For these people, even going to school is like mission impossible. Will any of these creamy layer people ever stand up for the people in the villages? Never. They are simply thinking of their own career prospects," he said.
Keeping this point in mind, one would like to know whether the Supreme Court judgement at any point say that primary education and secondary education are what need to be focussed and improved upon in terms of quality and access? This is something that was extremely important, much before one can move to reservation.
Harish Salve defended the Supreme Court saying that Justice Bhandari's judgement was a scathing indictment of the manner in which one never talks of primary eduction, but always talk of reservation in IIMs and IITs.
"Justice Bhandari's judgement and the Chief Justice's judgement reflect this concern. The entire fight against the creamy layer gives out the true motivation of what exactly is going on here. This particular judgement resonates economic criteria over and over again as a very important part of classification of classes," he stated.
Rajiv Gandhi did not approve of Mandal
Salve also brought forth the point that one of the most scathing indictments of Mandal ever was Rajiv Gandhi's speech in Parliament as the leader of Opposition. At that time, Rajiv Gandhi had blasted the Mandal report to bits.
For years, the Congress was very critical of the Mandal report. In fact, right through the 80s, the Congress did not support the Mandal report. It was V P Singh who brought the Mandal report in. Today, Arjun Singh has adopted Mandal - Mandal Part II in a sense - and the Congress is embracing it.
Rajiv Gandhi had clearly stated that society would be divided because of reservations.
| Related links: | |























Read Comment | Post Comment
Quota...why can we not have a fair system ...60 years on theses fools who sit in parliament and their blind
Read Comment
Hi frns,
Let me tell you my own experience of few years back, my brother got rank less than 100 architecture
Read Comment
By excluding the creamy layer the Supreme Court has foolishly foresaken the poor among the upper castes. They will now
Read Comment
It seems the fight is against intellectuals besides upper caste. Otherwise the emphasis would have been primary, secondary schools not
Read Comment
For all those people who say Tamilnadu has got 69% reservation so it has done well in economic side is
Read Comment
Read more comment »