NETWORK18

News Videos Blogs

Font Size A+A-

Scarlette was murdered, reveals coroner

TimePublished on Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 21:29, Updated on Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 19:29 in Nation section

DOC TELLS ALL: The doctor's unwilling statement confirms Scarlette's family's suspicion.

DOC TELLS ALL: The doctor's unwilling statement confirms Scarlette's family's suspicion.


Featured Blog

Featured Slideshows

Ads by Google

Panaji: It's a case that has generated international attention. Did the Goa Police conspire to cover up Scarlette Keeling's murder as just another drowning death?

One man possibly has the answer — the coroner who carried out the first post mortem on Scarlette. After the controversy, like everyone involved in the case, he too had kept mum. But when CNN-IBN interviewed him on hidden camera, he revealed shocking details of a police cover-up.

The doctor (name concealed to protect identity) was part of the team that carried out the first post-mortem on Scarlette Keeling.

The Goa Police used the autopsy report to conclude that Scarlette had accidentally drowned, but the doctor says on hidden camera the report had clearly mentioned that the British teenager could have been murdered.

"The person who got the body for post-mortem is a man named Mr Lakshya Amondkar. I spoke to him. After that, he went and informed his superior, the sub-inspector at Anjuna, Nerlon Albuquerque. Between the two of them something transpired. I had informed Mr Lakshya Amondkar that the manner in which the person had died — in the water, with injuries and drugs — chances are that it was a homicide," says the doctor.

CNN-IBN has access to signed statements by a witness, Max Bulgakov, who says he identified Scarlette on the beach. Yet, the doctor says he was told by by Nerlon Albuquerque that the body had not been identified.

He also says that the police concealed details of the witnesses.

"Who came to identify the body, who was she last seen with? I asked Nerlon to take the details and provide them to me because I had to confirm or exclude sexual intercourse. I asked him to bring as many people as there were for that was material evidence for me," says the doctor.

CNN-IBN: So did you get that material evidence from them?

Doctor: No, they did not cooperate with me.

To read IBNLive stories on mobile, log on to m.ibnlive.com on your mobile browser

Ads by Google

Related Ads:

CNN-IBN Poll | All About the Money

The Real Estate Poll: Is property hot any longer?

Click here

Catch the results of The Real Estate Poll on All About the Money, weekdays 6.30 pm on CNN-IBN

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us

© 2008 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture