She is no Sati or Durga: Indian woman unveiled

TWO OF A KIND: The survey finds Indian women reject some stereotypes while adhering to others.
People who read this also read:
The challenge of change: Women emerge champs
But the first woman president is not quite a women’s president yet.
There are two dominant images of the modern Indian woman. The first image is that of the meek sati-savitri, an eternal victim who is yet to see the light of modern values. She may have donned modern clothes and started living in metropolis, yet she remains her conservative self, steeped in values of a male-dominated society. The other image is that of Durga, the irrepressible rebel, who cannot be contained or tamed.
Radicals and feminists often draw upon this imagery to script a story of the hidden modernity of Indian women. The tyranny of these two images often prevents us from listening to the voice of the modern Indian woman.
The findings of the CNN-IBN-CSDS-Indian Express survey of Indian women invite us to question both these images. To be sure, the survey has over-sampled urban women (56 per cent as compared to the national average of 28 per cent).
Yet it is not easy to fit in some of the findings with the sati-savitri image. Both urban and rural women reject some of the male-centric notions of gender roles:
-- There is an overwhelming support cutting across rural-urban and religious divide that parental property should be divided equally among daughters and sons. This sentiment is strongest among graduate, single women living in the metros. But even the younger generation of rural women clearly favour this.
-- The is a near consensus among women that their role should not be restricted to staying at home and looking after the family, as 77 of the urban and 69 of the rural support the proposition that there is nothing wrong in women going out and working. It is not just that practically every young graduate woman favours this idea. A majority of old and non-literate women too endorse the idea of working women.
-- Again, cutting across the rural-urban and class divide, our respondents reject the belief that too much education is not good for women. Even the uneducated do not favour this proposition.
-- If you thought all these opinions are about politically-correct subject, consider this: when asked to react to a proposition that there is nothing wrong for women to have sexual desires, the verdict is an abashed 3:1 in favour. The ratio is of course higher among the young metropolitan women, but no section displays a dominance of Victorian prudishness.
An incipient sexual revolution? The beginning of a much-delayed transition from a 'traditional' and 'conservative' mindset to a modern outlook?
Across sections women think of themselves as more sensitive than men | |||
Women are more sensitive than men… | Yes | No | No Opinion |
| All women | 77 | 14 | 9 |
Note: All figures in percent. Question wording: "Please tell me if you agree or disagree with the statement 'Women are more sensitive than men'?" | |||
But not everyone thinks that men are more intelligent than women | ||
Men are more intelligent… | Yes | No |
| All women | 46 | 45 |
| Graduates | 28 | 68 |
Note: All figures in percent. Rest 'no opinion'. Question wording: "Please tell me if you agree or disagree with the statement 'Men are more intelligent than women'?" | ||
| Related links: | |
















Total Comments: 30
Read Comment | Post Comment
Ha-ha...are these comments by the men folk not just a case in point?? Well...the only problem to a fast changing
Read Comment
Well asked!
Read Comment
Totally agree with u
Read Comment
It surprises me that the Urban Indian woman still say a big NO NO to a live-in. While our society
Read Comment
%22The first image is that of the meek sati-savitri, an eternal victim who is yet to see the light of
Read Comment